linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: imx8mn: A53 core clock no need to be critical

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:12:42 +0800
From:   Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To:     Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
Cc:     mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, leonard.crestez@....com,
        abel.vesa@....com, peng.fan@....com, ping.bai@....com,
        fugang.duan@....com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: imx8mn: A53 core clock no need to be critical

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 04:49:11PM +0800, Anson Huang wrote:
> 'A53_CORE' is just a mux and no need to be critical, being critical
> will cause its parent clock always ON which does NOT make sense,
> to make sure CPU's hardware clock source NOT being disabled during
> clock tree setup, need to move the 'A53_SRC'/'A53_CORE' reparent
> operations to after critical clock 'ARM_CLK' setup finished.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>

Applied all, thanks.