[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b547776c-2749-8b78-e35f-c6ed42be9759@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:56:23 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: <rdunlap@...radead.org>, <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <joe@...ches.com>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 10 (mtd/spi-nor/)
On 11/03/2020 07:12, Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 7:14:13 PM EET John Garry wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
>> content is safe
>>
>> +
>>
>> On 10/03/2020 14:37, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 3/10/20 2:19 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Changes since 20200306:
>>>>
>>>> Removed tree: nfc-next (abanboned)
>>>>
>>> doned
>>>
>>> on i386:
>>>
>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for MTD_SPI_NOR
>>
>> Uh, so kbuild honors a "select" of a config option which has unmet
>> dependencies:
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docu
>> mentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst?h=v5.6-rc5#n143
>>
>> So this looks introduced by:
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/d
>> rivers/spi/Kconfig?h=next-20200310&id=e14572c52546c16e159c4c1814984843a119e8
>
> Hi, John,
>
> Is there any need to select the MTD_SPI_NOR in SPI_HISI_SFC_V3XX? Can't we
> just drop the select?
Yes, I think that we can just drop it. That effectively reverts Joe's
change. The reason I added the select wasn't for building, but just for
practicality - MTD_SPI_NOR enables the driver of the devices attached.
In response to Randy:
>>> So this looks introduced by:
>>>
>>>
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/spi/Kconfig?h=next-20200310&id=e14572c52546c16e159c4c1814984843a119e823
>>>
>>>> Depends on [m]: MTD [=m] && SPI_MASTER [=y] > Selected by [y]:
>>>> - SPI_HISI_SFC_V3XX [=y] && SPI [=y] && SPI_MASTER [=y] &&
(ARM64 && ACPI [=y] || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) && HAS_IOMEM [=y]
>>
>> Would it be acceptable to move the Kconfig entry for this:
>>
>> config SPI_HISI_SFC_V3XX
>> tristate "HiSilicon SPI-NOR Flash Controller for Hi16XX chipsets"
>> depends on (ARM64 && ACPI) || COMPILE_TEST
>> depends on HAS_IOMEM
>> select MTD_SPI_NOR
>>
>> into drivers/mtd/spi-nor/Kconfig, say after this one:
>>
>> config SPI_HISI_SFC
>> tristate "Hisilicon FMC SPI-NOR Flash Controller(SFC)"
>> depends on ARCH_HISI || COMPILE_TEST
>> depends on HAS_IOMEM
>>
>> and drop the "select MTD_SPI_NOR" because when it's in
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/Kconfig,
>> it will depend on MTD_SPI_NOR.
>>
>
> These changes to 2 Kconfig files does fix the kconfig warning and
build errors.
> I don't know if it's acceptable, or if the source file also wants to be
> relocated. (I almost said "needs to be relocated," but it builds
fine without
> that change.)
As above, I think that we can drop the select for now. I'll do some
building test for that - even though it should be same as pre-e14572c52546
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists