[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200311080207.12046-2-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:02:06 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] drivers/base/cpu: Use scnprintf() for avoiding potential buffer overflow
Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given
buffer limit. Fix it by replacing with scnprintf().
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
---
drivers/base/cpu.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
index 6265871a4af2..67aaa052c7a2 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
@@ -258,13 +258,13 @@ static ssize_t print_cpus_offline(struct device *dev,
buf[n++] = ',';
if (nr_cpu_ids == total_cpus-1)
- n += snprintf(&buf[n], len - n, "%u", nr_cpu_ids);
+ n += scnprintf(&buf[n], len - n, "%u", nr_cpu_ids);
else
- n += snprintf(&buf[n], len - n, "%u-%d",
+ n += scnprintf(&buf[n], len - n, "%u-%d",
nr_cpu_ids, total_cpus-1);
}
- n += snprintf(&buf[n], len - n, "\n");
+ n += scnprintf(&buf[n], len - n, "\n");
return n;
}
static DEVICE_ATTR(offline, 0444, print_cpus_offline, NULL);
--
2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists