[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200311010908.42366-4-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 01:09:03 +0000
From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
To: boqun.feng@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] tcp: Add missing annotation for tcp_child_process()
Sparse reports warning at tcp_child_process()
warning: context imbalance in tcp_child_process() - unexpected unlock
The root cause is the missing annotation at tcp_child_process()
Add the missing __releases(&((child)->sk_lock.slock)) annotation
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
index ad3b56d9fa71..0e8a5b6e477c 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
@@ -817,6 +817,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_check_req);
int tcp_child_process(struct sock *parent, struct sock *child,
struct sk_buff *skb)
+ __releases(&((child)->sk_lock.slock))
{
int ret = 0;
int state = child->sk_state;
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists