[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5546ac4d-b9d1-336e-3861-b1f37e1d059c@vivier.eu>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:09:54 +0100
From: Laurent Vivier <laurent@...ier.eu>
To: YunQiang Su <syq@...ian.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
libc-alpha@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_misc: pass binfmt_misc P flag to the interpreter
Le 06/03/2020 à 09:09, YunQiang Su a écrit :
> From: Laurent Vivier <laurent@...ier.eu>
>
> It can be useful to the interpreter to know which flags are in use.
>
> For instance, knowing if the preserve-argv[0] is in use would
> allow to skip the pathname argument.
>
> This patch uses an unused auxiliary vector, AT_FLAGS, to add a
> flag to inform interpreter if the preserve-argv[0] is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@...ier.eu>
> Signed-off-by: YunQiang Su <syq@...ian.org>
> ---
Any advice to have this merged?
Do I really need to use another AT_ entry?
Thanks,
Laurent
Powered by blists - more mailing lists