lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:27:48 +0800
From:   Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To:     Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...il.com>,
        Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
CC:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Loongson: Add model name to /proc/cpuinfo



于 2020年3月11日 GMT+08:00 下午5:58:48, Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...il.com> 写到:
>Hello,
>
>> Model name:            Loongson-3A R3 (Loongson-3A3000) @ 1449MHz
>
>How is this different from the __cpu_name[] array?  Doesn't it serve
>the same purpose?
>E.g. on Alchemy, it lists the correct Model name. (I.e. "Au1000",
>"Au1250", ...)

Hi,

__cpu_name[] will be displayed as "cpu model" in cpuinfo, however
in x86 world, the name line is started with "model name".
Most user applications like lscpu, hwinfo is following x86's rule, we don't have superpower to move all of them.

Also rename "cpu model" will break current ABI, so just create a new array
for it would be a better option.

For why Loongson is doing this, I guess they need a chance to show
their business processor name instead of revision.

Thanks

>
>Manuel

-- 
Jiaxun Yang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ