[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN6PR04MB46404175998962B4FA575824FCFC0@SN6PR04MB4640.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 12:25:40 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: "huobean@...il.com" <huobean@...il.com>,
"alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
"beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
"tomas.winkler@...el.com" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
"cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/1] Revert "scsi: ufs: Let the SCSI core allocate
per-command UFS data"
Hi,
>
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
>
> Hi, Martin
>
> Based on Bart's feedack, the less risky way is to revert commit:
>
> 34656dda81ac "scsi: ufs: Let the SCSI core allocate per-command UFS data"
>
> Bean Huo (1):
> Revert "scsi: ufs: Let the SCSI core allocate per-command UFS data"
Maybe it's safer to revert the entire series?
Thanks,
Avri
>
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 198 ++++++++++++++------------------------
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 5 +
> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists