[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfa5b0c8-1ca6-5d1c-591b-67e783d979fd@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:02:54 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>,
"huobean@...il.com" <huobean@...il.com>,
"alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
"tomas.winkler@...el.com" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
"cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] RE: [PATCH 0/1] Revert "scsi: ufs: Let the SCSI core
allocate per-command UFS data"
On 3/11/20 5:53 AM, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> Hi, Avri
> Do you want to revert all or two (scsi: ufs: Let the SCSI core allocate per-command UFS data, scsi: core: Introduce {init,exit}_cmd_priv() )?
> Because the patches "scsi: ufs: Simplify two tests" and "scsi: ufs: Introduce ufshcd_init_lrb()" are ok to me.
> No problem keeping them. Just this one "scsi: core: Introduce {init,exit}_cmd_priv()" is not necessary, since no drivers it now.
I agree with Bean. The other patches from the same series are small and
easy to review. The SCSI core patch has been tested with other SCSI LLDs.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists