[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200311152922.2dc56137@xps13>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:29:22 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 013/491] INGENIC JZ47xx SoCs: Use fallthrough;
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote on Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:20:59
+0100:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 08:40, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Joe,
> >
> > Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:51:27 -0700:
> >
> > > Convert the various uses of fallthrough comments to fallthrough;
> > >
> > > Done via script
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b56602fcf79f849e733e7b521bb0e17895d390fa.1582230379.git.joe.com/
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/mmc/host/jz4740_mmc.c | 6 ++----
> > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4725b_bch.c | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch.c | 4 ++--
> > > sound/soc/codecs/jz4770.c | 2 +-
> > > 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > I like very much the new way to advertise for fallthrough statements,
> > but I am not willing to take any patch converting a single driver
> > anymore. I had too many from Gustavo when these comments had to be
> > inserted. I would really prefer a MTD-wide or a NAND-wide or at least a
> > raw-NAND-wide single patch (anything inside drivers/mtd/nand/raw/).
> >
> > Hope you'll understand!
>
> I fully agree (for mmc). One patch please.
>
> Another option is to make a big fat tree wide patch and ask Linus if
> he want to pick up immediately after an rc1. That should cause less
> disturbance for everyone, no?
Absolutely.
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists