[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1583941375.5293.33.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 11:42:55 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Philipp Rudo <prudo@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ima: add a new CONFIG for loading arch-specific
policies
On Sun, 2020-03-08 at 20:57 -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> From: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Every time a new architecture defines the IMA architecture specific
> functions - arch_ima_get_secureboot() and arch_ima_get_policy(), the IMA
> include file needs to be updated. To avoid this "noise", this patch
> defines a new IMA Kconfig IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT option, allowing
> the different architectures to select it.
>
> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> Cc: Philipp Rudo <prudo@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Thanks, Michael for the suggestion of using "imply". Seems to be
working nicely. Thanks, Nayna. I pushed this patch out to next-
integrity-testing. Could we get some tags on this version of the
patch?
thanks,
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists