lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e46a1ba6-e169-e5b5-7933-ab22848407df@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:45:43 -0500
From:   Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bitfield.h: add FIELD_MAX() and field_max()

On 3/10/20 8:48 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 3/10/20 4:58 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:29:38 -0700 Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>>> Without this patch, the IPA driver that was picked up a couple of days
>>> ago does not build...
>>
>> 😳 
>>
>> Yes please, Alex could you repost ASAP with [PATCH net-next] subject
>> and CC netdev to get it into the netdev patchwork?
>>
>> Please also make IPA:
>>
>> 	depends on (ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST) && 64BIT && NET
>>
>> Otherwise it's really hard to make sure the code builds.
> 
> Sorry all.  I have been on vacation the last few days and only now
> saw this.
> 
> I will put this together shortly.

I just sent an updated version of the field_max() patch.  I will do
the COMPILE_TEST change separately (and not today).

					-Alex

> 					-Alex
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ