linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] KVM: arm64: support enabling dirty log graually in small chunks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:45:25 +0800
From:   zhukeqian <zhukeqian1@...wei.com>
To:     "Zhoujian (jay)" <jianjay.zhou@...wei.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CC:     "kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "James Morse" <james.morse@....com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        "Huangweidong (C)" <weidong.huang@...wei.com>,
        "wangxin (U)" <wangxinxin.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] KVM: arm64: support enabling dirty log graually in small
 chunks

Hi Jay,

On 2020/3/11 15:34, Zhoujian (jay) wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: zhukeqian
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 3:20 PM
>> To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>> Cc: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu; kvm@...r.kernel.org;
>> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; Zhoujian (jay)
>> <jianjay.zhou@...wei.com>; Sean Christopherson
>> <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>; Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>;
>> James Morse <james.morse@....com>; Julien Thierry
>> <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>; Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>> Subject: Re: [RFC] KVM: arm64: support enabling dirty log graually in small chunks
>>
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On 2020/3/10 21:16, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On 2020-03-10 08:26, zhukeqian wrote:
>>>> Hi Marc,
>>>>
>>>> On 2020/3/9 19:45, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>>> Kegian,
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>> Is there a userspace counterpart to it?
>>>>>
>>>> As this KVM/x86 related changes have not been merged to mainline
>>>> kernel, some little modification is needed on mainline Qemu.
>>>
>>> Could you please point me to these changes?
>> I made some changes locally listed below.
>>
>> However, Qemu can choose to enable KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET or not.
>> Here I made no judgement on dirty_log_manual_caps because I just want to
>> verify the optimization of this patch.
>>
>> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c index
>> 439a4efe52..1611f644a4 100644
>> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> @@ -2007,14 +2007,16 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms)
>>      s->coalesced_pio = s->coalesced_mmio &&
>>                         kvm_check_extension(s,
>> KVM_CAP_COALESCED_PIO);
>>
>> -    s->manual_dirty_log_protect =
>> +    uint64_t dirty_log_manual_caps =
>>          kvm_check_extension(s,
>> KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2);
>> -    if (s->manual_dirty_log_protect) {
>> -        ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(s,
>> KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2, 0, 1);
>> +    if (dirty_log_manual_caps) {
>> +        ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(s,
>> KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2, 0,
>> +                                dirty_log_manual_caps);
>>          if (ret) {
>>              warn_report("Trying to enable
>> KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2 "
>>                          "but failed.  Falling back to the legacy mode. ");
>> -            s->manual_dirty_log_protect = false;
>> +        } else {
>> +            s->manual_dirty_log_protect = true;
>>          }
>>      }
> 
> FYI: I had submitted a patch to the Qemu community some days ago:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11419191/
This is very helpful, thanks.
> 
>>>
>>>> As I tested this patch on a 128GB RAM Linux VM with no huge pages,
>>>> the time of enabling dirty log will decrease obviously.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure how realistic that is. Not having huge pages tends to
>>> lead to pretty bad performance in general...
>> Sure, this has no effect on guests which are all of huge pages.
>>
>> For my understanding, once a guest has normal pages (maybe are initialized at
>> beginning or dissloved from huge pages), it can benefit from this patch.
> 
> Yes, I agree.
> 
I will send PATCH v1 soon.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Jay Zhou
> 
> .
>
Thanks,
Keqian