[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200312112136.GC1013@ninjato>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:21:36 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org,
Kieran Bingham <kieran@...uared.org.uk>,
Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] i2c: core: hand over reserved devices when
requesting ancillary addresses
> (perhaps i2c_verify_client() checking dev was not such a great idea, as
> callers need to act on dev && !verified anyway?)
Can be argued. I will have a second thought about it.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists