[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV=A-ObmHCsSQgbGCm=QxZ==3vSpFg3OMp-o0Aq=N3w6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:29:11 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Eric Miao <eric.miao@...dia.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@...esas.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: boot: Fix ATAGs with appended DTB
Hi Marek,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 1:23 PM Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> On 26.02.2020 21:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6:57 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> > <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 06:56:06PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 6:49 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> >>> <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 07:35:14AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >>>>> On 25.02.2020 15:47, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>>>>> At early boot, register r8 may contain an ATAGs or DTB pointer.
> >>>>>> When an appended DTB is found, its address is stored in r8, for
> >>>>>> extraction of the RAM base address later.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> However, if r8 contained an ATAGs pointer before, that pointer will be
> >>>>>> lost, and the provided ATAGs is no longer folded into the provided DTB.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fix this by leaving r8 untouched.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Fixes: 137e522593918be2 ("ARM: 8960/1: boot: Obtain start of physical memory from DTB")
> >>>>>> Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> >>>> The original commit hasn't been submitted, so it can be fixed before it
> >>>> hits mainline if you want. Let me know what you want to do. Thanks.
> >>> Fixing the original is fine for me, of course.
> >>> Thanks!
> >> Please submit a replacement for 8960/1, thanks.
> > Done.
>
> Gentle ping. This fix is still not present in linux-next for over 2 weeks...
According to
https://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8963
the fixed version was applied less than one hour ago.
It's now part of arm/for-next.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists