linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 2/5] mm/sparse.c: introduce a new function clear_subsection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200312124414.439-3-bhe@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Mar 2020 20:44:11 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com,
        david@...hat.com, richard.weiyang@...il.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, bhe@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/5] mm/sparse.c: introduce a new function clear_subsection_map()

Factor out the code which clear subsection map of one memory region from
section_deactivate() into clear_subsection_map().

And also add helper function is_subsection_map_empty() to check if
the current subsection map is empty or not.

Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
 mm/sparse.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
index 5919bc5b1547..0be4d4ed96de 100644
--- a/mm/sparse.c
+++ b/mm/sparse.c
@@ -726,15 +726,11 @@ static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP */
 
-static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
-		struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
+static int clear_subsection_map(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
 {
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION) = { 0 };
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(tmp, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION) = { 0 };
 	struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
-	bool section_is_early = early_section(ms);
-	struct page *memmap = NULL;
-	bool empty;
 	unsigned long *subsection_map = ms->usage
 		? &ms->usage->subsection_map[0] : NULL;
 
@@ -745,8 +741,28 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
 	if (WARN(!subsection_map || !bitmap_equal(tmp, map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION),
 				"section already deactivated (%#lx + %ld)\n",
 				pfn, nr_pages))
-		return;
+		return -EINVAL;
 
+	bitmap_xor(subsection_map, map, subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static bool is_subsection_map_empty(struct mem_section *ms)
+{
+	return bitmap_empty(&ms->usage->subsection_map[0],
+			    SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
+}
+
+static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
+		struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
+{
+	struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
+	bool section_is_early = early_section(ms);
+	struct page *memmap = NULL;
+	bool empty;
+
+	if (clear_subsection_map(pfn, nr_pages))
+		return;
 	/*
 	 * There are 3 cases to handle across two configurations
 	 * (SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n}):
@@ -764,8 +780,7 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
 	 *
 	 * For 2/ and 3/ the SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n} cases are unified
 	 */
-	bitmap_xor(subsection_map, map, subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
-	empty = bitmap_empty(subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
+	empty = is_subsection_map_empty(ms);
 	if (empty) {
 		unsigned long section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
 
-- 
2.17.2