linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: Fix dtc unit-address warnings in examples

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqK8n-YTsROL+XhjJVtFJzV-aGPxhLOxs1axHq5+TvE-Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:17:50 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:     dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>,
        Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: Fix dtc unit-address warnings in examples

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 4:40 PM Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 04:00:01PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Extra dtc warnings (roughly what W=1 enables) are now enabled by default
> > when building the binding examples. These were fixed treewide in
> > 5.6-rc5, but some new display bindings have been added with new
> > warnings:
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/raydium,rm68200.example.dts:17.7-27.11: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-0/dsi@0: node has a unit name, but no reg property
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-simple-dsi.example.dts:17.19-31.11: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-0/mdss_dsi@...22800: node has a unit name, but no reg property
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/orisetech,otm8009a.example.dts:17.7-26.11: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-0/dsi@0: node has a unit name, but no reg property
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.example.dts:21.27-49.11: Warning (unit_address_format): /example-0/dss@...00000: unit name should not have leading 0s
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,j721e-dss.example.dts:21.27-72.11: Warning (unit_address_format): /example-0/dss@...00000: unit name should not have leading 0s
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,k2g-dss.example.dts:20.27-42.11: Warning (unit_address_format): /example-0/dss@...40000: unit name should not have leading 0s
> >
> > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> > Cc: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
> > Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
>
> And I can drop my patch that only fixed the panel/ parts - good.

It seems I missed some panels. Perhaps ones that are in drm-misc, but
not in linux-next yet? Keep yours and I'll respin with just the TI
part.

Rob