linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] x86/purgatory: Make sure we fail the build if purgatory.ro has missing symbols

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200312151244.GH15619@zn.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:12:44 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] x86/purgatory: Make sure we fail the build if
 purgatory.ro has missing symbols

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 03:57:41PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> I understand that you are pushing-back against people using 0day bot
> to find bugs for them and that was never my goal.

No, this is not it: the 0day bot is very helpful, when it works, to
catch issues like that. But it is not always reliable, thus I suggested
for you to do the testing yourself before sending your next patchset.
That's all.

But that's fine - I have a test setup on which to run this so we don't
have to wait for the 0day bot.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette