linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] hugetlbfs: use i_mmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1584028670.7365.182.camel@lca.pw>
Date:   Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:57:50 -0400
From:   Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] hugetlbfs: use i_mmap_rwsem for more synchronization

On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 16:26 -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> While discussing the issue with huge_pte_offset [1], I remembered that
> there were more outstanding hugetlb races.  These issues are:
> 
> 1) For shared pmds, huge PTE pointers returned by huge_pte_alloc can become
>    invalid via a call to huge_pmd_unshare by another thread.
> 2) hugetlbfs page faults can race with truncation causing invalid global
>    reserve counts and state.
> 
> A previous attempt was made to use i_mmap_rwsem in this manner as described
> at [2].  However, those patches were reverted starting with [3] due to
> locking issues.
> 
> To effectively use i_mmap_rwsem to address the above issues it needs to
> be held (in read mode) during page fault processing.  However, during
> fault processing we need to lock the page we will be adding.  Lock
> ordering requires we take page lock before i_mmap_rwsem.  Waiting until
> after taking the page lock is too late in the fault process for the
> synchronization we want to do.
> 
> To address this lock ordering issue, the following patches change the
> lock ordering for hugetlb pages.  This is not too invasive as hugetlbfs
> processing is done separate from core mm in many places.  However, I
> don't really like this idea.  Much ugliness is contained in the new
> routine hugetlb_page_mapping_lock_write() of patch 1.
> 
> The only other way I can think of to address these issues is by catching
> all the races.  After catching a race, cleanup, backout, retry ... etc,
> as needed.  This can get really ugly, especially for huge page reservations.
> At one time, I started writing some of the reservation backout code for
> page faults and it got so ugly and complicated I went down the path of
> adding synchronization to avoid the races.  Any other suggestions would
> be welcome.

Reverted this series on the top of today's linux-next fixed the hang with LTP
move_pages12 on both powerpc and arm64,

# /opt/ltp/testcases/bin/move_pages12
tst_test.c:1217: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
move_pages12.c:263: INFO: Free RAM 260577280 kB
move_pages12.c:281: INFO: Increasing 2048kB hugepages pool on node 0 to 4
move_pages12.c:291: INFO: Increasing 2048kB hugepages pool on node 8 to 4
move_pages12.c:207: INFO: Allocating and freeing 4 hugepages on node 0
move_pages12.c:207: INFO: Allocating and freeing 4 hugepages on node 8
<hang>

[ 3948.791155][  T688] INFO: task move_pages12:32930 can't die for more than
3072 seconds.
[ 3948.791181][  T688] move_pages12    D26224 32930      1 0x00040002
[ 3948.791199][  T688] Call Trace:
[ 3948.791210][  T688] [c000200816b4f680] [c0000000010b7a68]
cpufreq_update_util_data+0x0/0x8 (unreliable)
[ 3948.791234][  T688] [c000200816b4f860] [c00000000002615c]
__switch_to+0x38c/0x520
[ 3948.791247][  T688] [c000200816b4f8d0] [c0000000009a1c94]
__schedule+0x4b4/0xba0
[ 3948.791268][  T688] [c000200816b4f9a0] [c0000000009a2428] schedule+0xa8/0x170
[ 3948.791288][  T688] [c000200816b4f9d0] [c0000000009a2d0c]
io_schedule+0x2c/0x50
[ 3948.791300][  T688] [c000200816b4fa00] [c000000000331020]
__lock_page+0x150/0x3c0
[ 3948.791322][  T688] [c000200816b4fac0] [c000000000420164]
hugetlb_no_page+0xb04/0xd40
lock_page at include/linux/pagemap.h:480
(inlined by) hugetlb_no_page at mm/hugetlb.c:4286
[ 3948.791342][  T688] [c000200816b4fc10] [c000000000420bd8]
hugetlb_fault+0x738/0xc00
[ 3948.791363][  T688] [c000200816b4fcd0] [c0000000003b9c44]
handle_mm_fault+0x444/0x450
[ 3948.791384][  T688] [c000200816b4fd20] [c000000000070b98]
__do_page_fault+0x2b8/0xf90
[ 3948.791406][  T688] [c000200816b4fe20] [c00000000000aa88]
handle_page_fault+0x10/0x30

> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1582342427-230392-1-git-send-email-longpeng2@huawei.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20181222223013.22193-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190103235452.29335-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
> 
> Mike Kravetz (2):
>   hugetlbfs: use i_mmap_rwsem for more pmd sharing synchronization
>   hugetlbfs: Use i_mmap_rwsem to address page fault/truncate race
> 
>  fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c    |  34 +++++---
>  include/linux/fs.h      |   5 ++
>  include/linux/hugetlb.h |   8 ++
>  mm/hugetlb.c            | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  mm/memory-failure.c     |  29 ++++++-
>  mm/migrate.c            |  24 +++++-
>  mm/rmap.c               |  17 +++-
>  mm/userfaultfd.c        |  11 ++-
>  8 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>