[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f3c1c819a98deb77261e89eefa10e3f@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 17:23:43 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/23] irqchip/gic-v3: Use SGIs without active state if
offered
Hi Eric,
On 2020-03-12 17:16, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Marc,
[...]
>> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> index 83439bfb6c5b..c29a02678a6f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
>> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
>> #define GICD_SPENDSGIR 0x0F20
>>
>> #define GICD_CTLR_RWP (1U << 31)
>> +#define GICD_CTLR_nASSGIreq (1U << 8)
> I am not able to find this bit in Arm IHI 0069F (ID022020)
> same for the bit in GICD_TYPER. Do we still miss part of the spec?
See my response to Zenghui (TL;DR: this addition to the spec missed the
cut-off for revision F and will be added in the next round).
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists