linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v28 16/22] x86/sgx: Add a page reclaimer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200312183824.GB26453@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:38:24 -0700
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, nhorman@...hat.com, npmccallum@...hat.com,
        haitao.huang@...el.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, kai.svahn@...el.com, bp@...en8.de,
        josh@...htriplett.org, luto@...nel.org, kai.huang@...el.com,
        rientjes@...gle.com, cedric.xing@...el.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Ismo Puustinen <ismo.puustinen@...el.com>,
        Mark Shanahan <mark.shanahan@...el.com>,
        Mikko Ylinen <mikko.ylinen@...el.com>,
        Derek Bombien <derek.bombien@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v28 16/22] x86/sgx: Add a page reclaimer

On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 08:47:02PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 11:03:54AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > We've also discussed taking a file descriptor to hold the backing, but
> > unless I'm misreading the pagecache code, that doesn't solve the incorrect
> > accounting problem because the current task, i.e. evicting task, would be
> > charged.  In other words, whether the backing is kernel or user controlled
> > is purely an ABI question.
> 
> Even if the file is owned by a different process the account happens
> to "current"?

Yes.  Which makes sense as files do not have a 1:1 association with tasks.