[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200313141732.14b6e3e1@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 14:17:32 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
NetFilter <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the netfilter-next tree with the
net-next tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the netfilter-next tree got a conflict in:
net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
between commit:
978703f42549 ("netfilter: flowtable: Add API for registering to flow table events")
from the net-next tree and commit:
1f412791407b ("netfilter: flowtable: Use nf_flow_offload_tuple for stats as well")
from the netfilter-next tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
index 42b73a084a63,482a7284e122..000000000000
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
@@@ -596,8 -619,10 +597,11 @@@ static int nf_flow_offload_tuple(struc
i++;
}
+ mutex_unlock(&flowtable->flow_block_lock);
+ if (cmd == FLOW_CLS_STATS)
+ memcpy(stats, &cls_flow.stats, sizeof(*stats));
+
return i;
}
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists