[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <158406130956.149997.16470857788374770112@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 18:01:49 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
Tim Gover <tim.gover@...pberrypi.com>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/89] clk: bcm: rpi: Make the PLLB registration function return a clk_hw
Quoting Maxime Ripard (2020-02-24 01:06:22)
> The raspberrypi_register_pllb has been returning an integer so far to
> notify whether the functions has exited successfully or not.
>
> However, the OF provider functions in the clock framework require access to
> the clk_hw structure so that we can expose those clocks to device tree
> consumers.
>
> Since we'll want that for the future clocks, let's return a clk_hw pointer
> instead of the return code.
>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists