| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB35902AAC382503C40DEF929BAAFA0@OSBPR01MB3590.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:02:08 +0000
From: Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/3] media: i2c: ov5645: Switch to assigned-clock-rates
Hi Laurent,
Thank you for the review.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> Sent: 12 March 2020 23:03
> To: Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>; Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> <mchehab@...nel.org>; Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>; Sascha
> Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>; Pengutronix Kernel Team
> <kernel@...gutronix.de>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>; Mark
> Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>; Sakari Ailus
> <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>; NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>;
> Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>; Ezequiel Garcia
> <ezequiel@...labora.com>; open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED
> DEVICE TREE BINDINGS <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing
> List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-
> soc@...r.kernel.org>; Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>; Linux ARM
> <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>; Linux Media Mailing List <linux-
> media@...r.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] media: i2c: ov5645: Switch to assigned-clock-
> rates
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:52:38PM +0000, Prabhakar Mahadev Lad wrote:
> > On 12 March 2020 21:42, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:13 PM Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> > > > This patch switches to assigned-clock-rates for specifying the clock rate.
> > > > The clk-conf.c internally handles setting the clock rate when
> > > > assigned-clock-rates is passed.
> > > >
> > > > The driver now sets the clock frequency only if the deprecated
> > > > property clock-frequency is defined instead assigned-clock-rates,
> > > > this is to avoid breakage with existing DT binaries.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar
> > > > <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks for your patch!
> > >
> > > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c
> > > > @@ -1055,6 +1055,7 @@ static int ov5645_probe(struct i2c_client
> *client)
> > > > struct device_node *endpoint;
> > > > struct ov5645 *ov5645;
> > > > u8 chip_id_high, chip_id_low;
> > > > + bool set_clk = false;
> > > > unsigned int i;
> > > > u32 xclk_freq;
> > > > int ret;
> > > > @@ -1094,10 +1095,17 @@ static int ov5645_probe(struct i2c_client
> > > *client)
> > > > return PTR_ERR(ov5645->xclk);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "clock-frequency",
> > > &xclk_freq);
> > > > + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "assigned-clock-
> rates",
> > > > + &xclk_freq);
> > > > if (ret) {
> > >
> > > I think you can just leave out the above check...
> > >
> > > > - dev_err(dev, "could not get xclk frequency\n");
> > > > - return ret;
> > > > + /* check if deprecated property clock-frequency is defined */
> > > > + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "clock-
> frequency",
> > > > + &xclk_freq);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > >
> > > ... and ignore the absence of the deprecated property.
> > >
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "could not get xclk frequency\n");
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + }
> > > > + set_clk = true;
> > >
> > > I.e. just
> > >
> > > /* check if deprecated property clock-frequency is defined */
> > > xclk_freq = 0;
> > > of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "clock-frequency",
> &xclk_freq);
> > > if (xclk_freq) {
> > > ret = clk_set_rate(ov5645->xclk, xclk_freq);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > dev_err(dev, "could not set xclk frequency\n");
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > } else {
> > > xclk_freq = clk_get_rate(ov5645->xclk, xclk_freq);
> > > }
> > >
> > I did think about it initially, but realized the clk_get_rate may vary
> > platform to platform for example in G2E clk_get_rate() returns a
> > frequency of 24242424 with assigned-clock-rates set to 24000000 and
> > probe would fail due to a check for external clock must be 24MHz, with 1%
> tolerance.
>
> Then you need to handle the tolerance in this driver :-)
>
Sure I will increase the tolerance here.
Cheers,
--Prabhakar
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /* external clock must be 24MHz, allow 1% tolerance */ @@
> > > > -1107,10 +1115,12 @@ static int ov5645_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - ret = clk_set_rate(ov5645->xclk, xclk_freq);
> > > > - if (ret) {
> > > > - dev_err(dev, "could not set xclk frequency\n");
> > > > - return ret;
> > > > + if (set_clk) {
> > > > + ret = clk_set_rate(ov5645->xclk, xclk_freq);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "could not set xclk frequency\n");
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > for (i = 0; i < OV5645_NUM_SUPPLIES; i++)
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
Renesas Electronics Europe GmbH, Geschaeftsfuehrer/President: Carsten Jauch, Sitz der Gesellschaft/Registered office: Duesseldorf, Arcadiastrasse 10, 40472 Duesseldorf, Germany, Handelsregister/Commercial Register: Duesseldorf, HRB 3708 USt-IDNr./Tax identification no.: DE 119353406 WEEE-Reg.-Nr./WEEE reg. no.: DE 14978647
Powered by blists - more mailing lists