[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200313085030.GO1922688@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:50:30 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>,
grant.likely@....com, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] driver core: Break infinite loop when deferred
probe can't be satisfied
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:35:55AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 12/03/2020 12.54, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:32:32AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> On 09/03/2020 16.11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> >> Reviewed-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
> >
> > Thank you, Peter!
> >
> > Yes, under "successful probe" we understand the one that has stayed probed
> > after the deferred trigger cycle. That's why a decrement counter is essential
> > to make this scheme work.
> >
> > Ideally I would like to get Grant's comment on / test of this...
>
> I fixed up Grant's email address to get his attention you are seeking for...
Ah, thank you!
How can I forget that he moved to ARM while ago? Grant, I may re-send series
with your address corrected if it feels better to you.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists