[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200313103720.GA2215823@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:37:20 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>,
"ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
"tech-board-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org"
<tech-board-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [Tech-board-discuss] Linux Foundation
Technical Advisory Board Elections -- Change to charter
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:16:36AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:08 AM Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 10:41:57AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > On 3/13/20 10:35 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > >> Not that I'm saying there's an easy solution, but obviously kernel.org
> > > >> account is not as problem free as you might think.
> > > >
> > > > We are not saying it is "problem free", but what really is the problem
> > > > with it?
> > >
> > > IIUC there is no problem for its current use, but it would be rather restrictive
> > > if it was used as the only criterion for being able to vote for TAB remotely.
> >
> > Given that before now, there has not be any way to vote for the TAB
> > remotely, it's less restrictive :)
>
> But people without kernel.org accounts could still vote in person before,
> right?
Yes, and they still can today, this is expanding the pool, not
restricting it.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists