linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] Replace private domain with per-group default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200313133644.GO3794@8bytes.org>
Date:   Fri, 13 Mar 2020 14:36:44 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     ashok.raj@...el.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
        kevin.tian@...el.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
        Derrick Jonathan <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>,
        Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Replace private domain with per-group default

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:50:39PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> On 2020/3/10 19:15, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > Hi Baolu,
> > 
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 02:20:08PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > > Lu Baolu (5):
> > >    iommu: Configure default domain with dev_def_domain_type
> > >    iommu/vt-d: Don't force 32bit devices to uses DMA domain
> > >    iommu/vt-d: Don't force PCI sub-hierarchy to use DMA domain
> > >    iommu/vt-d: Add dev_def_domain_type callback
> > >    iommu/vt-d: Apply per-device dma_ops
> > > 
> > > Sai Praneeth Prakhya (1):
> > >    iommu: Add dev_def_domain_type() callback in iommu_ops
> > 
> > I like this patch-set, but I fear some regressions from patch
> > "iommu/vt-d: Don't force 32bit devices to uses DMA domain". Have you
> > tested this series on a couple of machines, ideally even older ones from
> > the first generation of VT-d hardware?
> 
> The oldest hardware I have is Ivy Bridge. :-) Actually, The effect of
> using identity domain for 32-bit devices is the same as that of adding
> intel_iommu=off in the kernel parameter. Hence, if there is any
> regression, people should also find it with intel_iommu=off.
> intel_iommu=off support is added at the very beginning of VT-d driver.

Okay, I will also do some testing on it, one of my VT-d machines is a
Haswell. Please send a new version with the recent comments addressed.

Regards,

	Joerg