[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200313154520.GA5375@afzalpc>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:15:20 +0530
From: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>,
Krzysztof HaĆasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: replace setup_irq() by request_irq()
Hi Olof, Arnd,
This is regarding cleanup of setup_irq() usages & replacing it w/
request_irq(). Earlier it was sent as single series spanning all
architectures & drivers, later Thomas Gleixner suggested [1] to take it
thr' relevant maintainers. As for ARM, there is an additional layer of
sub-architecture maintainers, for ARM, patches were sent to relevant
subsystem maintainers & mailing list, all copied to LAKML as well.
There were 10 sub-arch's in ARM that were subjected to the cleanup,
1. OMAP :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301121945.3604-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
2. ebsa110 :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122210.4013-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
3. rpc :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122300.4185-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
4. footbridge :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122131.3902-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
5. orion :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122330.4296-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
6. ep93xx :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122112.3847-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
7. spear :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122315.4240-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
8. cns3xxx :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122155.3957-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
9. mmp :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122243.4129-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
10. iop32x :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122226.4068-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
Of this,
(1) OMAP, (2) ebsa110 & (3) rpc are already in linux-next.
(4) footbridge (Russell) - there was a build warning, so he dropped
after applying to his tree, i have submitted the newer fixed version in
his patch system.
(5) orion - Andrew has given Reviewed-by & Gregory mentioned that he will
take care of it.
So if things goes as expected 1 & 5 will be coming to you thr' sub-arch
maintainers, while 2-4 directly via Russell
Now we are left with five (6-10),
(6) ep93xx - Alexander has given Acked-by & mentioned to take thr' Arnd
(7) spear - Viresh has given Acked-by & mentioned to take it thr' Arnd
(8) cns3xxx - Krzysztof has given Acked-by (though not copied to lists,
he has been cc'ed here)
(9) mmp - Lubomir has given Acked-by & Tested-by & mentioned to get it
thr' Olof
(10) iop32xx - per get_mantainer, an orphan
Can you please include the patches 6-10 directly into the armsoc tree ?,
Let me know if anything needs to be done from my side.
Regards
afzal
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87y2somido.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
Powered by blists - more mailing lists