[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200313161709.GA5181@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 09:17:09 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] KVM: nVMX: Rename exit_reason to vm_exit_reason
for nested VM-Exit
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 03:01:55PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com> writes:
>
> > Use "vm_exit_reason" when passing around the full exit reason for nested
> > VM-Exits to make it clear that it's not just the basic exit reason. The
> > basic exit reason (bits 15:0 of vmcs.VM_EXIT_REASON) is colloquially
> > referred to as simply "exit reason", e.g. vmx_handle_vmexit() tracks the
> > basic exit reason in a local variable named "exit_reason".
> >
>
> Would it make sense to stop using 'exit_reason' without a prefix (full,
> basic,...) completely?
I'd prefer to keep using exit_reason as a local variable. Either that or
grab the whole union locally and use "exit_reason.basic".
IMO, referring to the basic exit reason as simply "exit reason" is so
pervasive that it's reasonable to use exit_reason as a local variable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists