linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] parisc: Replace setup_irq() by request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Mar 2020 18:42:00 +0100
From:   Helge Deller <deller@....de>
To:     afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:     linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] parisc: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq()

On 13.03.20 13:39, afzal mohammed wrote:
> Hi Helge Deller,
>
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 06:20:24AM +0530, afzal mohammed wrote:
>> request_irq() is preferred over setup_irq(). Invocations of setup_irq()
>> occur after memory allocators are ready.
>>
>> Per tglx[1], setup_irq() existed in olden days when allocators were not
>> ready by the time early interrupts were initialized.
>>
>> Hence replace setup_irq() by request_irq().
>>
>> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1710191609480.1971@nanos
>>
>> Signed-off-by: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Hi parisc maintainers,
>>
>> if okay w/ this change, please consider taking it thr' your tree, else please
>> let me know.
>
> Seems you handle the pull requests for parisc, if this patch is okay,
> can you please consider for inclusion in your tree.

Applied into my for-next tree.

Thanks!
Helge