linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] sanitized pathwalk machinery (v4)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=whainTcvgF01vsSmN+y7s7U1qMA-QbM5qFQ3s4xQHwaJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:50:51 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] sanitized pathwalk machinery (v4)

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 4:53 PM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
>         Review and testing would be _very_ welcome;

I didn't notice anythign else than the few things I sent out to
individual patches.

But I have to say, 69 patches is too long of a series to review. I
think you could send them out as multiple series (you describe them
that way anyway - parts 1-7) with a day in between.

Because my eyes were starting to glaze over about halfway in the series.

But don't do it for this version. If you do a #5. But it would be good
to be in -next regardless of whether you do a #5 or not.

                 Linus