[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c31f0e1a0fe8ee268f27289f6f820c7e48596d5.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 21:32:29 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel23498@...il.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com,
sbrivio@...hat.com, daniel.baluta@...il.com,
nramas@...ux.microsoft.com, hverkuil@...all.nl,
Larry.Finger@...inger.net
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v2] Staging: rtl8723bs: rtw_mlme:
Remove unnecessary conditions
On Sat, 2020-03-14 at 16:58 +0530, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> This could be:
> > if ((!(phtpriv->ampdu_enable) && pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable ==
> > 1)) ||
> > pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 2)
> > phtpriv->ampdu_enable = true;
> >
> > Though it is probably more sensible to just set
> > phtpriv->ampdu_enable without testing whether or
> > not it's already set:
> >
> > if (pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 1 ||
> > pregistrypriv->ampdu_enable == 2)
> > phtpriv->ampdu_enable = true;
>
> But the else-if block which I removed in v2 of this patch had nothing
> in the block.
> It was not assigning any value to "phtpriv->ampdu_enable". ( basically
> it was empty and useless)
Right, I misread the deletions from patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists