[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200315162424.sh27zgjh3plronkc@treble>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 11:24:24 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/16] objtool: Optimize find_section_by_index()
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 02:41:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> In order to avoid a linear search (over 20k entries), add an
> section_hash to the elf object.
>
> This reduces objtool on vmlinux.o from a few minutes to around 45
> seconds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> tools/objtool/elf.c | 7 ++++++-
> tools/objtool/elf.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/tools/objtool/elf.c
> +++ b/tools/objtool/elf.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static struct section *find_section_by_i
> {
> struct section *sec;
>
> - list_for_each_entry(sec, &elf->sections, list)
> + hash_for_each_possible(elf->section_hash, sec, hash, idx)
> if (sec->idx == idx)
> return sec;
>
> @@ -191,6 +191,8 @@ static int read_sections(struct elf *elf
> }
> }
> sec->len = sec->sh.sh_size;
> +
> + hash_add(elf->section_hash, &sec->hash, sec->idx);
Can you move the
list_add_tail(&sec->list, &elf->sections);
down here so they're done at the same place?
> }
>
> if (stats)
> @@ -430,6 +432,7 @@ struct elf *elf_read(const char *name, i
> memset(elf, 0, sizeof(*elf));
>
> hash_init(elf->symbol_hash);
> + hash_init(elf->section_hash);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&elf->sections);
>
> elf->fd = open(name, flags);
> @@ -570,6 +573,8 @@ struct section *elf_create_section(struc
> shstrtab->len += strlen(name) + 1;
> shstrtab->changed = true;
>
> + hash_add(elf->section_hash, &sec->hash, sec->idx);
> +
> return sec;
> }
Ditto
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists