[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200314222128.mo4q3m72qoy76ayx@function>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 23:21:28 +0100
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jdike@...toit.com, richard@....at,
anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com, miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com,
willy@...roxy.com, ksenija.stanojevic@...il.com, arnd@...db.de,
mpm@...enic.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
jonathan@...zard.org.uk, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
davem@...emloft.net, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
pavel@....cz, len.brown@...el.com,
William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@...il.com>,
Chris Brannon <chris@...-brannons.com>,
Kirk Reiser <kirk@...sers.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] speakup: misc: Use dynamic minor numbers for
speakup devices
Hello,
Greg KH, le lun. 09 mars 2020 08:15:06 +0100, a ecrit:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:17:47AM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> > Arnd notes in the link:
> > | To clarify: the only numbers that I think should be changed to dynamic
> > | allocation are for drivers/staging/speakup. While this is a fairly old
> > | subsystem, I would expect that it being staging means we can be a
> > | little more progressive with the changes.
> >
> > This releases misc device minor numbers 25-27 for dynamic usage.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200120221323.GJ15860@mit.edu/t/
> > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...il.com>
Acked-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
> > Cc: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@...il.com>
> > Cc: Chris Brannon <chris@...-brannons.com>
> > Cc: Kirk Reiser <kirk@...sers.ca>
> > Cc: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/speakup/devsynth.c | 10 +++-------
> > drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_soft.c | 14 +++++++-------
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> speakup, while being in staging, has been around for a very long time,
> so we might break things if we change their minor numbers.
>
> I'd need an ACK from the speakup maintainers/developers before I can
> take this as I don't have any way to verify what their systems look
> like.
I believe it will be fine to use dynamic minor numbers, since the /dev
entries are autocreated nowadays, and the espeakup and speechd-up don't
use hardcoded minor values.
Thanks for making sure,
Samuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists