[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <888d1371-2eea-1cf2-5633-715fb047bbbb@codeaurora.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 00:16:27 +0530
From: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add YAML schemas for the QCOM
MSS clock bindings
I have combined all the bindings in the same patch to avoid any YAML
dependency.
On 2/26/2020 7:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 6:31 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Quoting Rob Herring (2020-02-25 05:58:19)
>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:49 PM Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>
>>>> On 2/25/2020 12:12 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
>>>>>
>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/simple-framebuffer.example.dts:21.16-37.11: Warning (chosen_node_is_root): /example-0/chosen: chosen node must be at root node
>>>>> Error: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7180-mss.example.dts:21.26-27 syntax error
>>>>> FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
>>>>> scripts/Makefile.lib:300: recipe for target 'Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7180-mss.example.dt.yaml' failed
>>>>> make[1]: *** [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7180-mss.example.dt.yaml] Error 1
>>>>> Makefile:1263: recipe for target 'dt_binding_check' failed
>>>>> make: *** [dt_binding_check] Error 2
>>>>>
>>>>> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1242999
>>>>> Please check and re-submit.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The error shows syntax error at line 21, below is the example.dts from
>>>> my tree and would compile for me as I have the dependency of the include
>>>> file when I compile.
>>>
>>> The header should be part of this patch if possible.
>>>
>>
>> Are patches tested in isolation instead of in series? I see this define
>> in the first patch in this series so it seems like automated checkers
>> should be able to apply the patches in series and see if they still
>> work, unless that is broken somehow.
>
> The series should be applied, but it's all very fragile. It's going to
> stay that way until someone else writes and maintains the applying
> patches to git logic.
>
> In any case, the header is part of the binding (being an ABI) not the
> driver, so it belongs in the binding patch.
>
>
> However, in this case, the problem was pointed out in v4 to be a typo
> in GCC_MSS_MFAB_AXIS_CLK.
>
> Rob
>
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists