lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 16 Mar 2020 22:13:35 +0100
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To:     Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
        Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix sparse warnings for common qe library code

On 12/03/2020 23.28, Li Yang wrote:
> The QE code was previously only supported on big-endian PowerPC systems
> that use the same endian as the QE device.  The endian transfer code is
> not really exercised.  Recent updates extended the QE drivers to
> little-endian ARM/ARM64 systems which makes the endian transfer really
> meaningful and hence triggered more sparse warnings for the endian
> mismatch.  Some of these endian issues are real issues that need to be
> fixed.
> 
> While at it, fixed some direct de-references of IO memory space and
> suppressed other __iomem address space mismatch issues by adding correct
> address space attributes.
> 
> Li Yang (6):
>   soc: fsl: qe: fix sparse warnings for qe.c
>   soc: fsl: qe: fix sparse warning for qe_common.c
>   soc: fsl: qe: fix sparse warnings for ucc.c
>   soc: fsl: qe: fix sparse warnings for qe_ic.c
>   soc: fsl: qe: fix sparse warnings for ucc_fast.c
>   soc: fsl: qe: fix sparse warnings for ucc_slow.c

Patches 2-5 should not change the generated code, whether LE or BE host,
as they merely add sparse annotations (please double-check with objdump
that that is indeed the case), so for those you may add

Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>

I think patch 1 is also correct, but I don't have hardware to test it on
ATM. I'd like to see patch 6 split into smaller pieces, most of it seems
obviously correct.

Rasmus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ