[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <766263cd-6b84-0c6b-d80a-d7f05fabd875@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 22:13:35 +0100
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix sparse warnings for common qe library code
On 12/03/2020 23.28, Li Yang wrote:
> The QE code was previously only supported on big-endian PowerPC systems
> that use the same endian as the QE device. The endian transfer code is
> not really exercised. Recent updates extended the QE drivers to
> little-endian ARM/ARM64 systems which makes the endian transfer really
> meaningful and hence triggered more sparse warnings for the endian
> mismatch. Some of these endian issues are real issues that need to be
> fixed.
>
> While at it, fixed some direct de-references of IO memory space and
> suppressed other __iomem address space mismatch issues by adding correct
> address space attributes.
>
> Li Yang (6):
> soc: fsl: qe: fix sparse warnings for qe.c
> soc: fsl: qe: fix sparse warning for qe_common.c
> soc: fsl: qe: fix sparse warnings for ucc.c
> soc: fsl: qe: fix sparse warnings for qe_ic.c
> soc: fsl: qe: fix sparse warnings for ucc_fast.c
> soc: fsl: qe: fix sparse warnings for ucc_slow.c
Patches 2-5 should not change the generated code, whether LE or BE host,
as they merely add sparse annotations (please double-check with objdump
that that is indeed the case), so for those you may add
Reviewed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
I think patch 1 is also correct, but I don't have hardware to test it on
ATM. I'd like to see patch 6 split into smaller pieces, most of it seems
obviously correct.
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists