lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 16 Mar 2020 22:43:18 +0100
From:   Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb get/set_irqchip_state
 SGI callbacks

Hi Marc,

On 3/4/20 9:33 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> To implement the get/set_irqchip_state callbacks (limited to the
> PENDING state), we have to use a particular set of hacks:
> 
> - Reading the pending state is done by using a pair of new redistributor
>   registers (GICR_VSGIR, GICR_VSGIPENDR), which allow the 16 interrupts
>   state to be retrieved.
> - Setting the pending state is done by generating it as we'd otherwise do
>   for a guest (writing to GITS_SGIR).
> - Clearing the pending state is done by emiting a VSGI command with the
emitting
>   "clear" bit set.
> 
> This requires some interesting locking though:
> - When talking to the redistributor, we must make sure that the VPE
>   affinity doesn't change, hence taking the VPE lock.
> - At the same time, we must ensure that nobody accesses the same
>   redistributor's GICR_VSGI*R registers for a different VPE, which
GICR_VSGIR
>   would corrupt the reading of the pending bits. We thus take the
>   per-RD spinlock. Much fun.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c   | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 14 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> index c93f178914ee..fb2b836c31ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> @@ -3962,11 +3962,84 @@ static int its_sgi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> +static int its_sgi_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
> +				     enum irqchip_irq_state which,
> +				     bool state)
> +{
> +	if (which != IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (state) {
> +		struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +		struct its_node *its = find_4_1_its();
> +		u64 val;
> +
> +		val  = FIELD_PREP(GITS_SGIR_VPEID, vpe->vpe_id);
> +		val |= FIELD_PREP(GITS_SGIR_VINTID, d->hwirq);
> +		writeq_relaxed(val, its->sgir_base + GITS_SGIR - SZ_128K);
> +	} else {
> +		its_configure_sgi(d, true);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int its_sgi_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
> +				     enum irqchip_irq_state which, bool *val)
> +{
> +	struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	u32 count = 1000000;	/* 1s! */
where does it come from? I did not find any info in the spec about this
delay.
> +	u32 status;
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	if (which != IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Locking galore! We can race against two different events:
> +	 *
> +	 * - Concurent vPE affinity change: we must make sure it cannot
> +         *   happen, or we'll talk to the wrong redistributor. This is
> +         *   identical to what happens with vLPIs.
> +	 *
> +	 * - Concurrent VSGIPENDR access: As it involves accessing two
> +         *   MMIO registers, this must be made atomic one way or another.
> +	 */
> +	cpu = vpe_to_cpuid_lock(vpe, &flags);
> +	raw_spin_lock(&gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->rd_lock);
> +	base = gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->rd_base + SZ_128K;
> +	writel_relaxed(vpe->vpe_id, base + GICR_VSGIR);
> +	do {
> +		status = readl_relaxed(base + GICR_VSGIPENDR);
> +		if (!(status & GICR_VSGIPENDR_BUSY))
> +			goto out;
> +
> +		count--;
> +		if (!count) {
> +			pr_err_ratelimited("Unable to get SGI status\n");
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +		cpu_relax();
> +		udelay(1);
> +	} while(count);
> +
> +out:
> +	raw_spin_unlock(&gic_data_rdist_cpu(cpu)->rd_lock);
> +	vpe_to_cpuid_unlock(vpe, flags);
> +	*val = !!(status & (1 << d->hwirq));
> +
> +	return 0;
cascade an error on timeout?
> +}
> +
>  static struct irq_chip its_sgi_irq_chip = {
>  	.name			= "GICv4.1-sgi",
>  	.irq_mask		= its_sgi_mask_irq,
>  	.irq_unmask		= its_sgi_unmask_irq,
>  	.irq_set_affinity	= its_sgi_set_affinity,
> +	.irq_set_irqchip_state	= its_sgi_set_irqchip_state,
> +	.irq_get_irqchip_state	= its_sgi_get_irqchip_state,
>  };
>  
>  static int its_sgi_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> index fd3be49ac9a5..830d2abf14b3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> @@ -345,6 +345,15 @@
>  #define GICR_VPENDBASER_4_1_VGRP1EN	(1ULL << 58)
>  #define GICR_VPENDBASER_4_1_VPEID	GENMASK_ULL(15, 0)
>  
> +#define GICR_VSGIR			0x0080
> +
> +#define GICR_VSGIR_VPEID		GENMASK(15, 0)
> +
> +#define GICR_VSGIPENDR			0x0088
> +
> +#define GICR_VSGIPENDR_BUSY		(1U << 31)
> +#define GICR_VSGIPENDR_PENDING		GENMASK(15, 0)
> +
>  /*
>   * ITS registers, offsets from ITS_base
>   */
> @@ -368,6 +377,11 @@
>  
>  #define GITS_TRANSLATER			0x10040
>  
> +#define GITS_SGIR			0x20020
> +
> +#define GITS_SGIR_VPEID			GENMASK_ULL(47, 32)
> +#define GITS_SGIR_VINTID		GENMASK_ULL(7, 0)
as spotted by Zenghui 3, 0
> +
>  #define GITS_CTLR_ENABLE		(1U << 0)
>  #define GITS_CTLR_ImDe			(1U << 1)
>  #define	GITS_CTLR_ITS_NUMBER_SHIFT	4
> 

Thanks

Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ