[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200316023411.1263-20-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 22:33:56 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: luanshi <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 20/35] drivers/perf: arm_pmu_acpi: Fix incorrect checking of gicc pointer
From: luanshi <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>
[ Upstream commit 3ba52ad55b533760a1f65836aa0ec9d35e36bb4f ]
Fix bogus NULL checks on the return value of acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc()
by checking for a 0 'gicc->performance_interrupt' value instead.
Signed-off-by: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
index acce8781c456c..f5c7a845cd7bf 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
@@ -24,8 +24,6 @@ static int arm_pmu_acpi_register_irq(int cpu)
int gsi, trigger;
gicc = acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu);
- if (WARN_ON(!gicc))
- return -EINVAL;
gsi = gicc->performance_interrupt;
@@ -64,11 +62,10 @@ static void arm_pmu_acpi_unregister_irq(int cpu)
int gsi;
gicc = acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu);
- if (!gicc)
- return;
gsi = gicc->performance_interrupt;
- acpi_unregister_gsi(gsi);
+ if (gsi)
+ acpi_unregister_gsi(gsi);
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SPE_PMU)
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists