[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200316071447.GD3486@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:14:47 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, willy@...radead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, mhocko@...e.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
richard.weiyang@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/sparse.c: Use kvmalloc_node/kvfree to alloc/free
memmap for the classic sparse
On 03/13/20 at 04:04pm, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 12.03.20 15:17, Baoquan He wrote:
> > This change makes populate_section_memmap()/depopulate_section_memmap
> > much simpler.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > v2->v3:
> > Remove __GFP_NOWARN and use array_size when calling kvmalloc_node()
> > per Matthew's comments.
> >
> > mm/sparse.c | 27 +++------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> > index bf6c00a28045..bb99633575b5 100644
> > --- a/mm/sparse.c
> > +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> > @@ -734,35 +734,14 @@ static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap)
> > struct page * __meminit populate_section_memmap(unsigned long pfn,
> > unsigned long nr_pages, int nid, struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> > {
> > - struct page *page, *ret;
> > - unsigned long memmap_size = sizeof(struct page) * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> > -
> > - page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN, get_order(memmap_size));
> > - if (page)
> > - goto got_map_page;
> > -
> > - ret = vmalloc(memmap_size);
> > - if (ret)
> > - goto got_map_ptr;
> > -
> > - return NULL;
> > -got_map_page:
> > - ret = (struct page *)pfn_to_kaddr(page_to_pfn(page));
> > -got_map_ptr:
> > -
> > - return ret;
> > + return kvmalloc_node(array_size(sizeof(struct page),
> > + PAGES_PER_SECTION), GFP_KERNEL, nid);
>
>
> Indentation of the parameters looks wrong/weird. Maybe just calculate
> memmap_size outside of the call, makes it easier to read IMHO.
I'll fix the indentation issue. Adding variable memmap_size seems not so
necessary.
>
> Apart from that, looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists