[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200316085536.GB1831@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 01:55:36 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 2/3] mm/gup: fix omission of check on FOLL_LONGTERM in
gup fast path
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:34:03PM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> FOLL_LONGTERM is a special case of FOLL_PIN. It suggests a pin which is
> going to be given to hardware and can't move. It would truncate CMA
> permanently and should be excluded.
>
> In gup slow path, slow path, where
> __gup_longterm_locked->check_and_migrate_cma_pages() handles FOLL_LONGTERM,
> but in fast path, there lacks such a check, which means a possible leak of
> CMA page to longterm pinned.
>
> Place a check in try_grab_compound_head() in the fast path to fix the leak,
> and if FOLL_LONGTERM happens on CMA, it will fall back to slow path to
> migrate the page.
>
> Some note about the check:
> Huge page's subpages have the same migrate type due to either
> allocation from a free_list[] or alloc_contig_range() with param
> MIGRATE_MOVABLE. So it is enough to check on a single subpage
> by is_migrate_cma_page(subpage)
>
> Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
> To: linux-mm@...ck.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> mm/gup.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index 9df77b1..78132cf 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,15 @@ static __maybe_unused struct page *try_grab_compound_head(struct page *page,
> int orig_refs = refs;
>
> /*
> + * Huge page's subpages have the same migrate type due to either
> + * allocation from a free_list[] or alloc_contig_range() with
> + * param MIGRATE_MOVABLE. So it is enough to check on a subpage.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) &&
> + is_migrate_cma_page(page))
> + return NULL;
Wrong indentation. We either align two tabs for continuation
statements, or after the opening brace of the previous line. With a
likely or unlikely thrown in the former IMHO looks much better. E.g.
if (unlikely(flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) &&
is_migrate_cma_page(page))
return NULL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists