[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB3PR0402MB391683A05820920158DFDA77F5F90@DB3PR0402MB3916.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 09:08:53 +0000
From: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"dmitry.torokhov@...il.com" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"amit.kucheria@...durent.com" <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
"wim@...ux-watchdog.org" <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
"linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux@...pel-privat.de" <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"m.felsch@...gutronix.de" <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
"andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"ronald@...ovation.ch" <ronald@...ovation.ch>,
"krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 1/7] firmware: imx: Add stubs for !CONFIG_IMX_SCU case
Hi, Alexandre
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/7] firmware: imx: Add stubs for !CONFIG_IMX_SCU
> case
>
> On 16/03/2020 08:44:10+0000, Anson Huang wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/7] firmware: imx: Add stubs for
> > > !CONFIG_IMX_SCU case
> > >
> > > On 16/03/2020 08:04:17+0000, Anson Huang wrote:
> > > > Hi, Shawn
> > > >
> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/7] firmware: imx: Add stubs for
> > > > > !CONFIG_IMX_SCU case
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 03:18:43AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > > > Just sent out. One more thing, I think all drivers depends on
> > > > > > IMX_SCU should not have COMPILE_TEST if we plan not to add
> > > > > > dummy functions. I see you picked up Anson's patch in
> > > > > > imx/drivers branch,
> > > please check more.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ha, yes. COMPILE_TEST should be dropped for IMX_SCU_PD in
> > > > > Anson's
> > > patch.
> > > > > Thanks for reminding.
> > > >
> > > > I still NOT quite understand why we won't support COMPILE_TEST for
> > > > SCU drivers, with whose stubs, the build should be OK, if there is
> > > > any build error, we should try to fix it, NOT just remove the
> > > > COMPILE_TEST
> > > support, any special reason?
> > > >
> > >
> > > COMPILE_TEST is supported as long as IMX_SCU is selected like is it
> > > for any driver depending on any bus.
> >
> > But without having " || COMPILE_TEST " in kconfig, COMPILE_TEST will
> > NOT be supported, I think as long as we have stubs for those SCU APIs,
> > all drivers depending on IMX_SCU can support COMPILE_TEST
> independently.
> >
>
>
> Why do you absolutely need to compile them independently? From a code
> coverage point of view, having:
>
> COMPILE_TEST=y
> CONFIG_IMX_SCU=y
>
> is enough to select and compile the remaining drivers.
What I meant is for below case, like using other arch config which does NOT have
CONFIG_IMX_SCU selected, ONLY with COMPILE_TEST selected, adding stubs for
IMX_SCU APIs can fix such scenario.
COMPILE_TEST=y
CONFIG_IMX_SCU=n
Anson
Powered by blists - more mailing lists