[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b98d601-d9d9-879c-918c-737830d80ac5@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:33:27 -0400
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, jgross@...e.com,
sstabellini@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com
Cc: x86@...nel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
jslaby@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/xen: Make the boot CPU idle task reliable
On 3/12/20 10:20 AM, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/xen-head.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/xen-head.S
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(startup_xen)
> rep __ASM_SIZE(stos)
>
> mov %_ASM_SI, xen_start_info
> - mov $init_thread_union+THREAD_SIZE, %_ASM_SP
> + mov $init_thread_union+THREAD_SIZE-SIZEOF_PTREGS, %_ASM_SP
This is initial_stack, isn't it?
-boris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists