linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 04/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for notifications message processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:03:25 +0000
From:   Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     sudeep.holla@....com, lukasz.luba@....com,
        james.quinlan@...adcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
        cristian.marussi@....com
Subject: [PATCH v5 04/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for notifications message processing

From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>

Add the mechanisms to distinguish notifications from delayed responses and
to properly fetch notification messages upon reception: notifications
processing does not continue further after the fetch phase.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
[Reworked/renamed scmi_handle_xfer_delayed_resp()]
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
---
V1 --> V2
- switch the notif/delayed_resp message processing logic to use new
  transport independent layer methods
- reviewed logic of scmi_handle_xfer_delayed_resp() while renaming it as
  scmi_handle_response()
- properly relocated tracer points
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
index efb660c34b57..868cc36a07c9 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
@@ -202,29 +202,42 @@ __scmi_xfer_put(struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&minfo->xfer_lock, flags);
 }
 
-/**
- * scmi_rx_callback() - callback for receiving messages
- *
- * @cinfo: SCMI channel info
- * @msg_hdr: Message header
- *
- * Processes one received message to appropriate transfer information and
- * signals completion of the transfer.
- *
- * NOTE: This function will be invoked in IRQ context, hence should be
- * as optimal as possible.
- */
-void scmi_rx_callback(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, u32 msg_hdr)
+static void scmi_handle_notification(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, u32 msg_hdr)
 {
-	struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(cinfo->handle);
-	struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo = &info->tx_minfo;
-	u16 xfer_id = MSG_XTRACT_TOKEN(msg_hdr);
-	u8 msg_type = MSG_XTRACT_TYPE(msg_hdr);
-	struct device *dev = cinfo->dev;
 	struct scmi_xfer *xfer;
+	struct device *dev = cinfo->dev;
+	struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(cinfo->handle);
+	struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo = &info->rx_minfo;
+
+	xfer = scmi_xfer_get(cinfo->handle, minfo);
+	if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to get free message slot (%ld)\n",
+			PTR_ERR(xfer));
+		info->desc->ops->clear_notification(cinfo);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	unpack_scmi_header(msg_hdr, &xfer->hdr);
+	scmi_dump_header_dbg(dev, &xfer->hdr);
+	info->desc->ops->fetch_notification(cinfo, info->desc->max_msg_size,
+					    xfer);
+
+	trace_scmi_rx_done(xfer->transfer_id, xfer->hdr.id,
+			   xfer->hdr.protocol_id, xfer->hdr.seq,
+			   MSG_TYPE_NOTIFICATION);
 
-	if (msg_type == MSG_TYPE_NOTIFICATION)
-		return; /* Notifications not yet supported */
+	__scmi_xfer_put(minfo, xfer);
+
+	info->desc->ops->clear_notification(cinfo);
+}
+
+static void scmi_handle_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
+				 u16 xfer_id, u8 msg_type)
+{
+	struct scmi_xfer *xfer;
+	struct device *dev = cinfo->dev;
+	struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(cinfo->handle);
+	struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo = &info->tx_minfo;
 
 	/* Are we even expecting this? */
 	if (!test_bit(xfer_id, minfo->xfer_alloc_table)) {
@@ -248,6 +261,37 @@ void scmi_rx_callback(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, u32 msg_hdr)
 		complete(&xfer->done);
 }
 
+/**
+ * scmi_rx_callback() - callback for receiving messages
+ *
+ * @cinfo: SCMI channel info
+ * @msg_hdr: Message header
+ *
+ * Processes one received message to appropriate transfer information and
+ * signals completion of the transfer.
+ *
+ * NOTE: This function will be invoked in IRQ context, hence should be
+ * as optimal as possible.
+ */
+void scmi_rx_callback(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, u32 msg_hdr)
+{
+	u16 xfer_id = MSG_XTRACT_TOKEN(msg_hdr);
+	u8 msg_type = MSG_XTRACT_TYPE(msg_hdr);
+
+	switch (msg_type) {
+	case MSG_TYPE_NOTIFICATION:
+		scmi_handle_notification(cinfo, msg_hdr);
+		break;
+	case MSG_TYPE_COMMAND:
+	case MSG_TYPE_DELAYED_RESP:
+		scmi_handle_response(cinfo, xfer_id, msg_type);
+		break;
+	default:
+		WARN_ONCE(1, "received unknown msg_type:%d\n", msg_type);
+		break;
+	}
+}
+
 /**
  * scmi_xfer_put() - Release a transmit message
  *
-- 
2.17.1