[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHLCerPBxe=Az=EexxYQkgvhRO40JT0qEhnAwqnGbeesiU-bnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:43:58 +0530
From: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: Yuantian Tang <andy.tang@....com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: thermal: make cooling-maps property optional
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 8:22 PM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 09/03/2020 05:54, andy.tang@....com wrote:
> > From: Yuantian Tang <andy.tang@....com>
> >
> > Cooling-maps doesn't have to be a required property because there may
> > be no cooling device on system, or there are no enough cooling devices for
> > each thermal zone in multiple thermal zone cases since cooling devices
> > can't be shared.
> > So make this property optional to remove such limitations.
> >
> > For thermal zones with no cooling-maps, there could be critic trips
> > that can trigger CPU reset or shutdown. So they still can take actions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuantian Tang <andy.tang@....com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
>
> Amit, I'm about to pick this patch, it will collide with the yaml
> conversion changes.
Thanks for the headsup. I can fixup v3 when I respin.
However, I've always interpreted this binding as follows:
- cooling-maps should be mandatory for active and passive trip types
otherwise there will be no cooling
- cooling-maps make no sense for critical trip type since we're
invoking system shutdown
- cooling-maps are optional for hot trip types.
Is this your understanding too?
We should be able to enforce this in YAML.
Regards,
Amit
Powered by blists - more mailing lists