[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8cfddb6cbc424b131c9ab823c0c0f3f1@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 22:07:04 +0530
From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, joro@...tes.org,
ohad@...ery.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
agross@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Request direct mapping for modem firmware subdevice
Hey Christoph,
Thanks for taking time to review
the series.
On 2020-03-16 21:20, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:52:52PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>> The Q6 modem sub-system has direct access to DDR through memnoc and
>> an indirect access routed through a SMMU which MSS CE (crypto engine
>> sub-component of MSS) uses during out of reset sequence. Request
>> direct
>> mapping for the modem-firmware subdevice since smmu is not expected
>> to provide access control/translation for these SIDs (sandboxing of
>> the
>> modem is achieved through XPUs engaged using SMC calls).
>
> Please fix your device tree so that the device isn't bound to an
> IOMMU.
the bindings proposed in the series
would add a sub-device with an iommu
property.
modem_pil: remoteproc@...xx {
...
modem-firmware {
iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x460 0x1>;
};
...
};
Remoteproc device will not have a iommu
property but modem-firmware sub-device
will.
With ARM_SMMU_DISABLE_BYPASS_BY_DEFAULT y,
we would want to configure the SID either
in direct mapping or bypass (either will
do since protection is achieved through
other means)
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/497e40b8-300f-1b83-4312-93a58c459d1d@arm.com/
Currently the restructuring is trending
towards whats discussed in the ^^ thread.
i.e either direct mapping/bypass will be
done in the SoC specific corner of the
SMMU driver.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists