| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:46:15 -0700
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Rocky Liao <rjliao@...eaurora.org>
Cc: marcel@...tmann.org, johan.hedberg@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, bgodavar@...eaurora.org,
c-hbandi@...eaurora.org, hemantg@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add support for Qualcomm
Bluetooth SoC QCA6390
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 05:43:27PM +0800, Rocky Liao wrote:
> This patch adds support for QCA6390, including the devicetree and acpi
> compatible hwid matching, and patch/nvm downloading.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rocky Liao <rjliao@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h | 8 +++++++
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
> index a16845c0751d..ca126e499c58 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
>
> #define VERSION "0.1"
>
> +#define QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type) \
> + (soc_type == QCA_WCN3991 || soc_type == QCA_QCA6390)
This macro style is 3991 or 6390 is pretty ugly, IMO it's worse than the
problem it intends to solve.
I would either just spell out what the macro does, or if that becomes to
cumbersome (especially when more types are added) have a macro that checks
a bitmask like:
qca_soc_type_matches(soc_type, QCA_WCN3991 | QCA6390)
For this the SoC types read from FW would have to be mapped to a bit for
each SoC type, which could be done during initialization.
Another alternative could be to have a set of flags that indicate if a SoC
has certain characteristics (e.g. enhanced logging needs to be enabled),
these flags could be set during initialization.
> +
> int qca_read_soc_version(struct hci_dev *hdev, u32 *soc_version,
> enum qca_btsoc_type soc_type)
> {
> @@ -32,7 +35,7 @@ int qca_read_soc_version(struct hci_dev *hdev, u32 *soc_version,
> * VSE event. WCN3991 sends version command response as a payload to
> * command complete event.
> */
> - if (soc_type == QCA_WCN3991) {
> + if (QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type)) {
> event_type = 0;
> rlen += 1;
> rtype = EDL_PATCH_VER_REQ_CMD;
> @@ -69,7 +72,7 @@ int qca_read_soc_version(struct hci_dev *hdev, u32 *soc_version,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (soc_type == QCA_WCN3991)
> + if (QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type))
> memmove(&edl->data, &edl->data[1], sizeof(*ver));
>
> ver = (struct qca_btsoc_version *)(edl->data);
> @@ -138,6 +141,29 @@ int qca_send_pre_shutdown_cmd(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qca_send_pre_shutdown_cmd);
>
> +int qca_send_enhancelog_enable_cmd(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + int err;
> + const u8 param[2] = {0x14, 0x01};
> +
> + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "QCA enhanced log enable cmd");
> +
> + skb = __hci_cmd_sync_ev(hdev, QCA_ENHANCED_LOG_ENABLE_CMD, 2,
> + param, HCI_EV_CMD_COMPLETE, HCI_INIT_TIMEOUT);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(skb);
> + bt_dev_err(hdev, "Enhanced log enable cmd failed (%d)", err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qca_send_enhancelog_enable_cmd);
> +
> static void qca_tlv_check_data(struct qca_fw_config *config,
> const struct firmware *fw, enum qca_btsoc_type soc_type)
> {
> @@ -217,7 +243,7 @@ static void qca_tlv_check_data(struct qca_fw_config *config,
> tlv_nvm->data[0] |= 0x80;
>
> /* UART Baud Rate */
> - if (soc_type == QCA_WCN3991)
> + if (QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type))
> tlv_nvm->data[1] = nvm_baud_rate;
> else
> tlv_nvm->data[2] = nvm_baud_rate;
> @@ -268,7 +294,7 @@ static int qca_tlv_send_segment(struct hci_dev *hdev, int seg_size,
> * VSE event. WCN3991 sends version command response as a payload to
> * command complete event.
> */
> - if (soc_type == QCA_WCN3991) {
> + if (QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type)) {
> event_type = 0;
> rlen = sizeof(*edl);
> rtype = EDL_PATCH_TLV_REQ_CMD;
> @@ -301,7 +327,7 @@ static int qca_tlv_send_segment(struct hci_dev *hdev, int seg_size,
> err = -EIO;
> }
>
> - if (soc_type == QCA_WCN3991)
> + if (QCA_IS_3991_6390(soc_type))
> goto out;
>
> tlv_resp = (struct tlv_seg_resp *)(edl->data);
> @@ -442,6 +468,11 @@ int qca_uart_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev, uint8_t baudrate,
> (soc_ver & 0x0000000f);
> snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
> "qca/crbtfw%02x.tlv", rom_ver);
> + } else if (soc_type == QCA_QCA6390) {
> + rom_ver = ((soc_ver & 0x00000f00) >> 0x04) |
> + (soc_ver & 0x0000000f);
> + snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
> + "qca/htbtfw%02x.tlv", rom_ver);
> } else {
> snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
> "qca/rampatch_%08x.bin", soc_ver);
> @@ -464,6 +495,9 @@ int qca_uart_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev, uint8_t baudrate,
> else if (qca_is_wcn399x(soc_type))
> snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
> "qca/crnv%02x.bin", rom_ver);
> + else if (soc_type == QCA_QCA6390)
> + snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
> + "qca/htnv%02x.bin", rom_ver);
> else
> snprintf(config.fwname, sizeof(config.fwname),
> "qca/nvm_%08x.bin", soc_ver);
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
> index e16a4d650597..bc703817c3d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #define EDL_NVM_ACCESS_SET_REQ_CMD (0x01)
> #define MAX_SIZE_PER_TLV_SEGMENT (243)
> #define QCA_PRE_SHUTDOWN_CMD (0xFC08)
> +#define QCA_ENHANCED_LOG_ENABLE_CMD (0xFC17)
>
> #define EDL_CMD_REQ_RES_EVT (0x00)
> #define EDL_PATCH_VER_RES_EVT (0x19)
> @@ -127,6 +128,7 @@ enum qca_btsoc_type {
> QCA_WCN3990,
> QCA_WCN3991,
> QCA_WCN3998,
> + QCA_QCA6390,
QCA_QCAxxxx seems a bit redundant, why not call it QCA_6390 or QCA6390?
I also wouldn't be opposed to scrap the QCA_ prefixes from the WCN399x
types, this is the QCA Bluetooth driver, so it's pretty evident that
these are Qualcomm chips.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists