linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] mm/kmemleak: annotate a data race in checksum

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4B4A327C-D7DA-4CCA-9CA5-F63035ADBCAB@lca.pw>
Date:   Tue, 17 Mar 2020 09:42:17 -0400
From:   Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm/kmemleak: annotate a data race in checksum



> On Mar 17, 2020, at 9:31 AM, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 14:22, Qian Cai <cai@....pw> wrote:
>> 
>> Even if KCSAN is disabled for kmemleak, update_checksum() could still
>> call crc32() (which is outside of kmemleak.c) to dereference
>> object->pointer. Thus, the value of object->pointer could be accessed
>> concurrently as noticed by KCSAN,
>> 
>> BUG: KCSAN: data-race in crc32_le_base / do_raw_spin_lock
>> 
>> write to 0xffffb0ea683a7d50 of 4 bytes by task 23575 on cpu 12:
>>  do_raw_spin_lock+0x114/0x200
>>  debug_spin_lock_after at kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:91
>>  (inlined by) do_raw_spin_lock at kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:115
>>  _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50
>>  __handle_mm_fault+0xa9e/0xd00
>>  handle_mm_fault+0xfc/0x2f0
>>  do_page_fault+0x263/0x6f9
>>  page_fault+0x34/0x40
>> 
>> read to 0xffffb0ea683a7d50 of 4 bytes by task 839 on cpu 60:
>>  crc32_le_base+0x67/0x350
>>  crc32_le_base+0x67/0x350:
>>  crc32_body at lib/crc32.c:106
>>  (inlined by) crc32_le_generic at lib/crc32.c:179
>>  (inlined by) crc32_le at lib/crc32.c:197
>>  kmemleak_scan+0x528/0xd90
>>  update_checksum at mm/kmemleak.c:1172
>>  (inlined by) kmemleak_scan at mm/kmemleak.c:1497
>>  kmemleak_scan_thread+0xcc/0xfa
>>  kthread+0x1e0/0x200
>>  ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
>> 
>> If a shattered value was returned due to a data race, it will be
>> corrected in the next scan. Thus, annotate it as an intentional data
>> race using the data_race() macro.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
>> ---
>> mm/kmemleak.c | 7 ++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
>> index e362dc3d2028..d3327756c3a4 100644
>> --- a/mm/kmemleak.c
>> +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
>> @@ -1169,7 +1169,12 @@ static bool update_checksum(struct kmemleak_object *object)
>>        u32 old_csum = object->checksum;
>> 
>>        kasan_disable_current();
> 
> Suggested:
> + kcsan_disable_current();
> 
>> -       object->checksum = crc32(0, (void *)object->pointer, object->size);
>> +       /*
>> +        * crc32() will dereference object->pointer. If an unstable value was
>> +        * returned due to a data race, it will be corrected in the next scan.
>> +        */
>> +       object->checksum = data_race(crc32(0, (void *)object->pointer,
>> +                                          object->size));
> 
> This will work with the default config, because for word-sized-aligned
> writes no marking is enforced. But this will still cause a data race
> if the write is e.g. due to a memcpy.

I saw this spla atmt but just decided to reuse an old one to save some time.

Looks like that "head->func = func;” not aligned.

[77392.095571][  T839] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in call_rcu / crc32_le_base
[77392.102066][  T839] 
[77392.104297][  T839] write to 0xffff898ea73a8748 of 8 bytes by task 114682 on cpu 79:
[77392.112111][  T839]  call_rcu+0xe8/0x4b0
__call_rcu at kernel/rcu/tree.c:2701
(inlined by) call_rcu at kernel/rcu/tree.c:2777
[77392.116084][  T839]  __fput+0x23a/0x3d0
[77392.119970][  T839]  ____fput+0x1e/0x30
[77392.123852][  T839]  task_work_run+0xba/0x120
[77392.128257][  T839]  do_syscall_64+0x7d7/0xb05
[77392.132753][  T839]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3
[77392.138544][  T839] 
[77392.140760][  T839] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[77392.145478][  T839] irq event stamp: 0
[77392.149270][  T839] hardirqs last  enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[77392.156307][  T839] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0ab4d42>] copy_process+0x1122/0x3240
[77392.165348][  T839] softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0ab4d42>] copy_process+0x1122/0x3240
[77392.174384][  T839] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[77392.181405][  T839] 
[77392.183625][  T839] read to 0xffff898ea73a8748 of 4 bytes by task 839 on cpu 46:
[77392.191088][  T839]  crc32_le_base+0x67/0x350
[77392.195498][  T839]  kmemleak_scan+0x3ee/0x9f0
[77392.199992][  T839]  kmemleak_scan_thread+0x9f/0xc4
[77392.204921][  T839]  kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0
[77392.208894][  T839]  ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50

> 
> There are already markers for KASAN around, so the most reliable thing
> is to just disable KCSAN in this region.

OK, I’ll test that a bit first.

> 
>>        kasan_enable_current();
> 
> Suggested:
> + kcsan_enable_current();
> 
> Thanks,
> -- Marco
> 
>>        return object->checksum != old_csum;
>> --
>> 2.21.0 (Apple Git-122.2)