lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 17 Mar 2020 14:59:56 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] DT: Improve validation for Marvell SoCs

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:55:59PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 17/03/2020 14:46:09+0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:38:54AM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > > Hello World,
> > 
> > Yah, that is an issue here. Marvell have a few different SoC families,
> > each with there own maintainers. Gregory and I tend to look after
> > 'mvebu', aka orion5x, kirkwood, dove, berlin and a few others. All the
> > others are 'Somebody elses' problem'.
> > 
> 
> Hum, berlin is not mvebu, it was the same BU as the MMP and it has been
> sold to synopsys a while ago.

Yes, the boundaries are a bit fluffy. At least the early work by
Sebastian was merged via the mvebu maintainers, even if it is not
technically part of mvebu.

This is also part of the discussion about how this lot actually gets
merged.

	   Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ