linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: replace setup_irq() by request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Mar 2020 10:07:02 +0530
From:   afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        soc@...nel.org, arm@...nel.org
Cc:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Hałasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
        Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: replace setup_irq() by request_irq()

+ soc@...nel.org, arm@...nel.org,

in case it helps to reduce the chances of below mail getting slipped
thr' the cracks.

Regards
afzal

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:15:20PM +0530, afzal mohammed wrote:
> Hi Olof, Arnd,
> 
> This is regarding cleanup of setup_irq() usages & replacing it w/
> request_irq(). Earlier it was sent as single series spanning all
> architectures & drivers, later Thomas Gleixner suggested [1] to take it
> thr' relevant maintainers. As for ARM, there is an additional layer of
> sub-architecture maintainers, for ARM, patches were sent to relevant
> subsystem maintainers & mailing list, all copied to LAKML as well.
> 
> There were 10 sub-arch's in ARM that were subjected to the cleanup,
> 
> 1. OMAP :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301121945.3604-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
> 2. ebsa110 :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122210.4013-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
> 3. rpc :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122300.4185-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
> 4. footbridge :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122131.3902-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
> 5. orion :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122330.4296-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
> 6. ep93xx :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122112.3847-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
> 7. spear :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122315.4240-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
> 8. cns3xxx :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122155.3957-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
> 9. mmp :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122243.4129-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
> 10. iop32x :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122226.4068-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
> 
> Of this,
> 
> (1) OMAP, (2) ebsa110 & (3) rpc are already in linux-next.
> 
> (4) footbridge (Russell) - there was a build warning, so he dropped
> after applying to his tree, i have submitted the newer fixed version in
> his patch system.
> 
> (5) orion - Andrew has given Reviewed-by & Gregory mentioned that he will
> take care of it.
> 
> So if things goes as expected 1 & 5 will be coming to you thr' sub-arch
> maintainers, while 2-4 directly via Russell
> 
> Now we are left with five (6-10),
> (6) ep93xx - Alexander has given Acked-by & mentioned to take thr' Arnd
> (7) spear - Viresh has given Acked-by & mentioned to take it thr' Arnd
> (8) cns3xxx - Krzysztof has given Acked-by (though not copied to lists,
> he has been cc'ed here)
> (9) mmp - Lubomir has given Acked-by & Tested-by & mentioned to get it
> thr' Olof
> (10) iop32xx - per get_mantainer, an orphan
> 
> Can you please include the patches 6-10 directly into the armsoc tree ?,
> Let me know if anything needs to be done from my side.
> 
> Regards
> afzal
> 
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87y2somido.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de