lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce541b0c-7ddb-ed4d-9529-c1d48a38b6a6@nxp.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:20:25 +0200
From:   Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>
To:     Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
Cc:     "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] crypto: caam - allocate RNG instantiation
 descriptor with GFP_DMA

On 3/16/2020 6:15 AM, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 6:08 AM Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@....com> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/27/2020 6:57 PM, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>>> Be consistent with the rest of the codebase and use GFP_DMA when
>>> allocating memory for a CAAM JR descriptor.
>>>
>> Please use GFP_DMA32 instead.
>> Device is not limited to less than 32 bits of addressing
>> in any of its incarnations.
>>
>> s/GFP_DMA/GFP_DMA32 should be performed throughout caam driver.
>> (But of course, I wouldn't include this change in current patch series).
>>
> 
> Hmm, I am triggering
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/mm/slub.c?h=v5.6-rc6#n1721
> by using GFP_DMA32. AFAICT, GFP_DMA32 can't be used in SLUB/SLAB
> allocated memory:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/mm/internal.h?h=v5.6-rc6#n32
> 
Indeed.

> I'll stick with GFP_DMA for now, unless you have a different preference.
> 
I'm ok with this, will deal with memory allocation separately.

Thanks,
Horia

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ