[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200317180147.GB12959@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:01:47 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] KVM: nVMX: Move reflection check into
nested_vmx_reflect_vmexit()
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 06:38:20PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 17/03/20 18:00, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >
> > On the other hand, I'm a great fan of splitting checkers ('pure'
> > functions) from actors (functions with 'side-effects') and
> > nested_vmx_exit_reflected() while looking like a checker does a lot of
> > 'acting': nested_mark_vmcs12_pages_dirty(), trace printk.
>
> Good idea (trace_printk is not a big deal, but
> nested_mark_vmcs12_pages_dirty should be done outside). I'll send a
> patch, just to show that I can still write KVM code. :)
LOL, don't jinx yourself.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists